Bit-Slice Design: Controllers and ALUs

by Donnamaie E. White

Copyright © 1996, 2001, 2002, 2008 Donnamaie E. White

 
 

Preface

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

2. Simple Controllers

3. Adding Programming Support to the Controller

4. Refining the CCU

5. Evolution of the ALU

6. The ALU and Basic Arithmetic

7. Tying the System Together

Glossary

 

 

Refining the CCU

Last Edit November 2, 1996; May 1, 1999; July 7, 2001


Interconnection of the Am2914

Single Unit

The Am2914 requires that the status overflow pin be connected to the interrupt disable pin. The GAR and GEN pins are grounded; GAS, GSIG, RDIS, and PDIS are left floating. When the highest priority interrupt is reached, the interrupt controller is disabled until a new status is loaded or a master clear is executed. The highest level interrupt should be reserved for catastrophic occurrences.

For all other status levels, when a higher status is to be executed, and recovery is desired, the existing status should be read so that it may be reloaded upon completion of the higher level interrupt, if another higher level interrupt has not occurred in the interim. Care should be taken to eliminate or reduce cycles in status read and load operations. (Possibly a decrementing of the current status and check on interrupts is a better unwinding procedure.)

Interconnection

To interconnet a single Am2914 to the microsystem, the Am2914 must receive four instruction bits and an instruction enable bit from the pipeline register. The 16-bit system data bus would be used to supply the 3-bit status read/load lines and the 8-bit mask read/load lines. The vector output would feed the vector mapping PROM or other decode unit, which in turn would connect to the 16-bit data bus.

The eight interrupt request lines would be connected to whatever interrupts are to be allowed in the proper priority sequence. The interrupt request line is tied high through 470ohms and inputs to either the CC' input of the Am2910 or some similar connection. This provides an 8-level interrupt control system (see Figure 4-31).

Figure 4-31 An 8-level interrupt control unit

A 16-level interconnect is shown in Figure 4-32 using an Am2913 expander; 64-level systems are demonstrated in an AMD application note.

Figure 4-32 16-level interrupt control unit for Am2900 system

Microprogram Interrupt

The Am2914 interrupt controller may be interconnect to provide a microprogram level interrupt system or a machine program interrupt system.

In the former, the microcode would contain tests for the occurrence of any interrupt at "quiet" points in the microcode. There are placed where the subroutine stack is empty, such as at the end of the microroutine for an opcode or between modules within a very long microroutine. The response to the interrupt is relatively fast; the op code itself is unchanged, but it does require additional control memory storage.

The occurrence of an interrupt would cause a branch address to be input to the PROM/ROM (through the Am2910 ro Am2911s), which in turn would cause the interrupt service microroutine to begin executing. The end of this service microroutine would cause either a return to the interrupted op code miroroutine or a JMAP to fetch the next op code.

The interrupt routine could be called by a simple conditional jump or by a sonditional jump to subroutine. A controller using an Am2910, and an Am2914 is shown in Figure 4-33

Figure 4-33 Computer control unit for microprogram interrupt system

Machine Level Interrupt

A machine program interrupt system may test for an interrupt only at the end of the microroutine for the current opcode since the contents of the instruction register will be destroyed. The existence of an interrupt in this case would cause the vector map to output to the system data bus.

Two procedures could exist. In the first, the vector map output could in fact be a special opcode. The microroutine for this special opcode would exist in the PROM memory, and a start address would exist for the microroutine in the memory map. This is a relatively fast procedure but requires space for the opcodes and a large control memory.

In the second, the vector map output would be processed by system software and would be used to call up a machine level interrupt program. The program would be executed as any other software program. This is a relatively slow interrupt service procedure, with the advantages of having no additional microprogram PROM requirements and requiring no additional map space.

A computer control unit for machine program interrupt handling si shown in Figure 4-34, constructed from an Am2910 and two Am2914s. Note that this version does not require a decoder for the output enable of the memory map. As shown, the OE'vect must come from the microword just as the instruction register load control and other system controls do.

Figure 4-34 Computer control unit for machine program interrupt system

 

 

For information about this file or to report problems in its use email [email protected]
Copyright © September 1996, 1999, 2001, 2008 Donnamaie E. White WhitePubs Enterprises, Inc.